<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>debugall &#187; MPLS VPN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.debugall.co.uk/category/mpls/mpls-vpn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.debugall.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 06:33:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Multicast VPN</title>
		<link>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2011/06/27/multicast-vpn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2011/06/27/multicast-vpn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 06:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zarar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCIE SP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS VPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multicast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MVPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIM-SM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PIM-SM, PIM-SSM, and PIM-BIDIR are all supported inside the provider core for MVPN. PIM-SM or PIM-SSM is the recommended PIM option in the provider core, because PIM-BIDIR is not yet supported by all platforms, PIM-SM, PIM-SSM, PIM-BIDIR and PIM-DENSE-MODE are supported inside the MVPN. MVPN has the concepts of Multicast Distribution Trees (MDT). An MDT [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2011/06/27/multicast-vpn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inter-AS Option B &#8211; Revisited</title>
		<link>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/08/22/inter-as-option-b-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/08/22/inter-as-option-b-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zarar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCIE SP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inter-AS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS VPN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consider the topology below. Watch the video below or download and watch it on your iphone.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/08/22/inter-as-option-b-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ARF &#8211; Automatic Route Filtering</title>
		<link>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/12/28/arf-automatic-route-filtering/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/12/28/arf-automatic-route-filtering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 03:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zismail</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BGP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIE SP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS VPN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When designing an MPLS network you will have to decide whether to configure a full mesh of MP-iBGP sessions between your PEs as in diagram 1 below or whether to use a hub and spoke topology as in diagram 2 below. Diagram 1 &#8211; BGP full mesh Diagram 2 &#8211; BGP partial mesh The most [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/12/28/arf-automatic-route-filtering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carrier Supporting Carrier &#8211; CSC</title>
		<link>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/23/carrier-supporting-carrier-csc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/23/carrier-supporting-carrier-csc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zismail</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BGP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIE SP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS VPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carrier Supporting Carrier architecture is about connecting a single SPs POP sites using another Service Providers network. In Carrier Supporting Carrier terminology, the service provider who connects another service providers POP sites is known as the backbone carrier. The service provider whos POPs are connected via the backbone carrier is known as the customer carrier. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/23/carrier-supporting-carrier-csc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inter AS MPLS VPN Option B, 2a &#8211; Packet Capture</title>
		<link>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/21/inter-as-mpls-vpn-option-b-2a-packet-capture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/21/inter-as-mpls-vpn-option-b-2a-packet-capture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zismail</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCIE SP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inter-AS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS VPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BGP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve setup the topology below. I configured a loopback address with ip address 10.10.10.10 on PE1 and put it inside the VRF for VPN A.  One PE1 I could see the VPN label being generated by BGP as below. sh ip bgp vpnv4 all labels Network          Next Hop      In label/Out label Route Distinguisher: 65300:1 (CUST) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/21/inter-as-mpls-vpn-option-b-2a-packet-capture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inter AS MPLS VPN Option C &#8211; Packet Capture</title>
		<link>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/21/inter-as-mpls-vpn-option-c-packet-capture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/21/inter-as-mpls-vpn-option-c-packet-capture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zismail</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCIE SP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inter-AS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS VPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BGP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I setup the following topology. I configured a loopback address with ip address 10.10.10.10 on PE1 and put it inside the VRF for VPN A.  One PE1 I could see the VPN label being generated by BGP as below. sh ip bgp vpnv4 all labels Network          Next Hop      In label/Out label Route Distinguisher: 65300:1 (CUST) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/21/inter-as-mpls-vpn-option-c-packet-capture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Non VPN transit providers &#8211; Option 4?</title>
		<link>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/20/non-vpn-transit-providers-option-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/20/non-vpn-transit-providers-option-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zismail</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BGP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIE SP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inter-AS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS VPN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There can be cases where two MPLS VPN service providers would like to deliver an MPLS VPN service to a customer using a non-VPN transit provider ie this non-VPN transit provider has an MPLS infrastructure, but does not deliver MPLS VPN services. This architecture is sometimes referred to as Option 4(This is not mentioned in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/20/non-vpn-transit-providers-option-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forwarding MPLS traffic over a non LDP interface</title>
		<link>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/20/forwarding-mpls-traffic-over-a-non-ldp-interface/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/20/forwarding-mpls-traffic-over-a-non-ldp-interface/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zismail</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BGP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIE SP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inter-AS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS VPN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mpls bgp forwarding *To enable an interface to receive Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) packets when the signaling of MPLS labels is through the use of the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), use the mpls bgp forwarding command in interface configuration mode. To disable an interface from receiving MPLS packets when the signaling of MPLS labels is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/20/forwarding-mpls-traffic-over-a-non-ldp-interface/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inter-AS MPLS VPN Option C</title>
		<link>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/20/inter-as-mpls-vpn-option-c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/20/inter-as-mpls-vpn-option-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 05:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zismail</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BGP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIE SP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inter-AS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS VPN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Option C is the most complex of the three inter-AS MPLS VPN options, however its complexity has significant benefits in that it scales well. However there are some trust issues which need to be overcome.  Usually this Option is not implemented unless you have a merger for example and two ASs need to provide an [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/20/inter-as-mpls-vpn-option-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inter-AS MPLS VPN Option b &#8211; Type 2a</title>
		<link>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/19/inter-as-mpls-vpn-option-b-type-2a/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/19/inter-as-mpls-vpn-option-b-type-2a/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zismail</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BGP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIE SP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inter-AS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS VPN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inter AS MPLS VPN Option b has three options as described below. In the first option ie 2a an MP-eBGP session is configured between ASBRs to exchange VPNv4 prefixes. The Link between the ASBRs does NOT run LDP/TDP and does not require an IGP. The link is a straight forward point to point IP link. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/11/19/inter-as-mpls-vpn-option-b-type-2a/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

