<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>debugall &#187; CCIP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.debugall.co.uk/category/ccip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.debugall.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 06:33:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>BGP &#8211; Remove Private AS</title>
		<link>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/02/11/bgp-remove-private-as/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/02/11/bgp-remove-private-as/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zarar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BGP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIE SP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCNP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The video below shows how to remove a private AS from BGP as-path list. Consider the topology below. AS65300 peers eBGP with R1.  R1 then peers eBGP with R2. R1 is then configured to remove all private ASs in the as-path when it advertises BGP routes to R2. Watch the video below or download and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/02/11/bgp-remove-private-as/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eBGP multihop</title>
		<link>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/01/23/ebgp-multihop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/01/23/ebgp-multihop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zarar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BGP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIE SP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCNP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[eBGP multihop can be used to loadshare traffic across multiple links between eBGP peers. Consider the topology below. By default eBGP sessions can only be established between directly connected interfaces.  If you want to connect to a non-connected interface or to a non-connected neighbor, you have to use the eBGP-multihop feature. For this to work, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/01/23/ebgp-multihop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BGP &#8211; Prefix aggregation using a static route</title>
		<link>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/01/22/bgp-prefix-aggregation-using-a-static-route/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/01/22/bgp-prefix-aggregation-using-a-static-route/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zarar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BGP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIE SP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCNP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My previous post on BGP prefix aggregation used the bgp &#8220;aggregate-address&#8221; command.  Another way to generate an aggregate is by using a static route. Consider the toplology below. Watch the video below to see how to configure a BGP aggregate using a static route.  Alternatively down the video here and watch it on your iPod. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/01/22/bgp-prefix-aggregation-using-a-static-route/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prefix Lists</title>
		<link>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/12/30/prefix-lists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/12/30/prefix-lists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zismail</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BGP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIE SP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCNP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IP Prefix lists can be used with BGP to permit or deny specific prefixes from being advertised or learnt to or from a neighbor. Consider the topology below. We will carry out three exercises. configure a prefix list to match 192.168.1.0/24 configure a prefix list to match 192.168.1.0/24, 192.168.1.0/25, 192.168.1.0/26. configure a prefix list to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/12/30/prefix-lists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Cisco Certifications Logo</title>
		<link>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/12/28/new-cisco-certifications-logo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/12/28/new-cisco-certifications-logo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 03:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zismail</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCIE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIE SP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCNP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across this link recently.  It suggests that Cisco Certification Logos are changing. Follow the link to see the new logos.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/12/28/new-cisco-certifications-logo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BGP Route Aggregation</title>
		<link>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/12/26/bgp-route-aggregation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/12/26/bgp-route-aggregation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 05:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zismail</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BGP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIE SP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCNP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are times when it is required to aggregate a set of prefixes.  There are a number of reasons why you would want to do this such as, your peering transit edge may not accept certain size prefixes, you may want to reduce the size of the routing table in some part of your network [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debugall.co.uk/2008/12/26/bgp-route-aggregation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

