Comments on: OSPF down bit and domain tag http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/02/07/ospf-down-bit-and-domain-tag/ Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:35:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Uttamkumar http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/02/07/ospf-down-bit-and-domain-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-202 Uttamkumar Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:41:43 +0000 http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=696#comment-202 yes very nice presentation yes very nice presentation

]]> By: Kunal Puri http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/02/07/ospf-down-bit-and-domain-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-192 Kunal Puri Sat, 27 Mar 2010 03:47:01 +0000 http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=696#comment-192 Thanks i just saw video... Good Work No volume :-( Thanks i just saw video…

Good Work

No volume :-(

]]> By: Kunal Puri http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/02/07/ospf-down-bit-and-domain-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-191 Kunal Puri Sat, 27 Mar 2010 03:32:28 +0000 http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=696#comment-191 In which show command or debu command we can see PE router attaching Down bit or domain tag for the redistributed routes In which show command or debu command we can see PE router attaching Down bit or domain tag for the redistributed routes

]]> By: venkat http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/02/07/ospf-down-bit-and-domain-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-189 venkat Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:21:49 +0000 http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=696#comment-189 Nice explanation,Zarar. If possible, please explain the remaining field of "OSPF Domain ID" in the output of "show ip bgp vpnv4 all " .. Only one hex represents OSPF process ID (here,1) . what about other fields. Nice explanation,Zarar. If possible, please explain the remaining field of “OSPF Domain ID” in the output of “show ip bgp vpnv4 all ” .. Only one hex represents OSPF process ID (here,1) . what about other fields.

]]> By: Kelvin.H http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/02/07/ospf-down-bit-and-domain-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-179 Kelvin.H Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:20:58 +0000 http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=696#comment-179 base on your implementation above, and then use the "capability vrf-lite" command, you'll see that "O E2" routes(100.100.100.1) will turn back into "B" and I can explain reason why. base on your implementation above, and then use the “capability vrf-lite” command, you’ll see that “O E2″ routes(100.100.100.1) will turn back into “B” and I can explain reason why.

]]> By: Ahenning http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/02/07/ospf-down-bit-and-domain-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-175 Ahenning Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:25:31 +0000 http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=696#comment-175 Scott, I take it you meant set the domain-id to NULL. Scott, I take it you meant set the domain-id to NULL.

]]> By: Zarar http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/02/07/ospf-down-bit-and-domain-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-172 Zarar Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:33:19 +0000 http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=696#comment-172 Thanks for sharing the tip with us Scott. Thanks for sharing the tip with us Scott.

]]> By: Scott Morris http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/02/07/ospf-down-bit-and-domain-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-171 Scott Morris Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:47:23 +0000 http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=696#comment-171 Good write-up. As a note, you can also (instead of using capability vrf-lite) reset the domain-tag to NULL and things will work as well. ;) Good write-up. As a note, you can also (instead of using capability vrf-lite) reset the domain-tag to NULL and things will work as well. ;)

]]> By: MOHAMMED IMRAN KHAN http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/02/07/ospf-down-bit-and-domain-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-129 MOHAMMED IMRAN KHAN Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:45:47 +0000 http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=696#comment-129 Who said Type 5 LSAs do not contain options field in the header. It does have a 8 bit field. Who said Type 5 LSAs do not contain options field in the header. It does have a 8 bit field.

]]> By: Amit http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/02/07/ospf-down-bit-and-domain-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-128 Amit Tue, 08 Sep 2009 04:45:50 +0000 http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=696#comment-128 Very nicely done. Very nicely done.

]]>