Comments on: eBGP multihop http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/01/23/ebgp-multihop/ Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:35:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: khush http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/01/23/ebgp-multihop/comment-page-1/#comment-195 khush Tue, 20 Apr 2010 06:18:22 +0000 http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=675#comment-195 thnx...it make me easy to understand this concept. thnx…it make me easy to understand this concept.

]]> By: V http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/01/23/ebgp-multihop/comment-page-1/#comment-187 V Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:15:14 +0000 http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=675#comment-187 So what is the difference between ebgp multihop and using maximum-paths 2 ? So what is the difference between ebgp multihop and using maximum-paths 2 ?

]]> By: Zarar http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/01/23/ebgp-multihop/comment-page-1/#comment-186 Zarar Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:17:21 +0000 http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=675#comment-186 eBGP itself can peer directly with the neighbors physical interface, however if you did that then the next hop for all routes would be the remote peers physical interface and not the loopback and hence you wouldn't get any load sharing. eBGP itself can peer directly with the neighbors physical interface, however if you did that then the next hop for all routes would be the remote peers physical interface and not the loopback and hence you wouldn’t get any load sharing.

]]> By: Ze Kai http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/01/23/ebgp-multihop/comment-page-1/#comment-185 Ze Kai Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:40:13 +0000 http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=675#comment-185 Hi, Do the neighbor ip need to be the loopback or the can it be the fa ip address? For this eBGP multi-hop. Thanks ZeKai Hi,
Do the neighbor ip need to be the loopback or the can it be the fa ip address? For this eBGP multi-hop. Thanks

ZeKai

]]> By: Zarar http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/01/23/ebgp-multihop/comment-page-1/#comment-121 Zarar Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:04:11 +0000 http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=675#comment-121 Hi Rankeshwar I haven't looked at this for a while. but basically if my memory serves me correctly the reason I configured the address 192.168.1.0 was to demonstrate the load sharing behavior that can be achieved using ebgp multihop as in the scenario. I dont know if you've had time to watch the video but you will see that cef see the route to 192.168.10 via both fast1/0 and fast1/1. Hope that clarifies things. Zarar Hi Rankeshwar

I haven’t looked at this for a while. but basically if my memory serves me correctly the reason I configured the address 192.168.1.0 was to demonstrate the load sharing behavior that can be achieved using ebgp multihop as in the scenario. I dont know if you’ve had time to watch the video but you will see that cef see the route to 192.168.10 via both fast1/0 and fast1/1.

Hope that clarifies things.

Zarar

]]> By: Rankeshwar http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/01/23/ebgp-multihop/comment-page-1/#comment-120 Rankeshwar Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:14:11 +0000 http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=675#comment-120 Nice one and understandable, same question as matt asked about 192.168.1.0 network Nice one and understandable, same question as matt asked about 192.168.1.0 network

]]> By: matt http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/01/23/ebgp-multihop/comment-page-1/#comment-111 matt Sun, 31 May 2009 20:49:05 +0000 http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=675#comment-111 Nice article. But what is 192.168.1.0 network. why it is only in router 2. Nice article. But what is 192.168.1.0 network.
why it is only in router 2.

]]> By: Calin http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/01/23/ebgp-multihop/comment-page-1/#comment-103 Calin Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:57:44 +0000 http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=675#comment-103 Hi! Nice article. Weiping you don't have to use disable-connected-check when you use ebgp-multihop. Use of disable-connected-check is an alternative to ebgp-multihop, and has nothing to do with update-source "interface". Actually update-source command has to be used in both configuration. Good luck! Hi!

Nice article.
Weiping you don’t have to use disable-connected-check when you use ebgp-multihop. Use of disable-connected-check is an alternative to ebgp-multihop, and has nothing to do with update-source “interface”. Actually update-source command has to be used in both configuration.

Good luck!

]]> By: Weiping http://www.debugall.co.uk/2009/01/23/ebgp-multihop/comment-page-1/#comment-96 Weiping Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:05:33 +0000 http://www.debugall.co.uk/?p=675#comment-96 I believe, there is command to use beside update-source loopback0, (For EBGP Peer Only) I believe if I am not mistaken the command is disable-connected-check under router bgp process I believe, there is command
to use beside update-source loopback0, (For EBGP Peer Only)

I believe if I am not mistaken
the command is disable-connected-check under router bgp process

]]>